In this report we present the methodology we are using in the AMI group to compare optic flow estimation methods in the context of the FLUID Specific Targeted Research Project - Contract No 513633 founded by the CEE. The main goal of this report is to try to unify comparison criteria between the different parnerts in order to share information and conclusions. We think that it is one of the topics we have to address in Las Palmas Meeting December next. In order to describe the methodology we use, we divide it in five steps: 1. We choose a number of optic flow estimation methods 2. We choose an image sequence dataset to apply the methods. 3. We apply the methods and we store the results in a ASCII file using an standard format 4. We define a number of statistics to compare the methods (we use the ASCII files as basic information to compare). 5. We compute the statistics for each pair of methods and we generate tables with the information. To help result interpretation we use arrow images and in the case we know the optic flow groundtruth we generate image to provide the information about what method perform better in the different areas of the image. To illustrate this approach and to fit ideas we present the results of this approach in a particular image sequence provided by LaVision in sections from 1.1 to 1.4. Then, in section 2 we remark some of the difficulties we have found in our work, which 首ld be discussed in order to be able to compare results provided by all the partners of the FLUID project. 自適應(yīng)粒子成像測速場儀（PIV） 德國LaVision 表面PIV 德國LaVision PIV/PLIF粒子成像測速場儀 汽車發(fā)動機多參量測試系統(tǒng) 顯微粒子成像測速系統(tǒng)(Micro PIV) 雙平面立體PIV 時間分辨粒子成像測速系統(tǒng)(TR-PIV) 內(nèi)窺式粒子成像測速系統(tǒng)(Endo-PIV) 水下粒子成像測速系統(tǒng)(Under Water PIV) 電動層析顯微粒子成像測速PIV-Mitas 三維立體PIV 體視層析粒子成像測速系統(tǒng)(Tomo-PIV)